❦
Tire Pyrolysis Companies 2026:
The Competitive Landscape
An independent assessment of the companies actually commercialising tire pyrolysis — ranked on the record, not on the press release.
How we rank
- I.Commercial proof
- II.Technology ownership & IP
- III.Deployment reach
- IV.Product certification
- V.Financial independence
Tire pyrolysis has spent two decades swinging between pioneer hype and quiet commercial progress. A small number of teams have actually made it work at industrial scale; a far larger group is still selling headlines. This report separates the two — weighing operating plants, court documents, published financials and certifications rather than marketing copy.
Every company below is assessed against the same five criteria. Where a claim cannot be verified against a primary source, we say so. Where a company disputes the technology behind its own plant, the record governs.
The ranking
Eight commercial players, assessed against the same five criteria, with three further companies flagged for financial or governance circumstances.
| # | Company | Base & approach | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Klean IndustriesTop commercial reference | Integrated licensor; continuous tire pyrolysis; global KBR licensing alliance. | The category's only published commercial result (€12M revenue / €5.8M EBITDA, 2023 — reported by the operator on Klean's technology), court-confirmed ownership, and a global KBR deployment alliance. |
| 2 | Circtec | Netherlands; large-scale pyrolysis, Farmsum. | Europe's largest operating rCB site; €150M raised (Novo Holdings, A.P. Moller, Dutch government). Financial results unpublished. |
| 3 | Eco Infinic | Thailand; tire pyrolysis & rCB, Si Racha. | Asia's largest by a wide margin — c.100k t/yr ELT to rCB, oil and steel; first commissioned on Enrestec equipment, now an own-developed process. |
| 4 | Enrestec | Taiwan; continuous pyrolysis (public, TPEX 7507). | The world's longest-running 24/7 tire pyrolysis (since 2013); public filings show continued losses as it scales. |
| 5 | Alpha Carbone | France; recovered carbon black & pyrolysis oil. | rCB production backed by an Orion Engineered Carbons investment. |
| 6 | Niutech Environment Technology | China; fully-continuous pyrolysis & equipment supply. | Supplies the continuous-kiln equipment used at several plants; own scale claims unverified. |
| 7 | Bolder Industries | United States; recovered carbon black (rCB). | One small operating plant (Maryville, c.7k t/yr); Terre Haute delayed, Antwerp unbuilt; substantial debt reported. |
| 8 | Reoil SP. z o.o. | Poland; operator of the Bukowno plant. | Operator of the Bukowno reference facility — the technology is CRR-developed, court-confirmed, and licensed through KBR. |
Sources published on each company profile. Full methodology here.
Flagged — under review
Three players excluded from the numbered ranking on disclosed financial or governance circumstances. Facts and sources on each profile.
| # | Company | Base & approach | Grounds |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚠ | Pyrum Innovations AG | Germany; thermolysis (rotary kiln), Dillingen. | Listed, but losing c.€10M/yr against €4.1M revenue (roughly half consulting fees) and a €53M accumulated deficit. |
| ⚠ | Scandinavian Enviro Systems | Sweden; continuous pyrolysis development. | No commercial-scale demonstration to date; its first-of-kind Uddevalla build is the subject of a €54M arbitration. |
| ⚠ | LD Carbon | South Korea; tire pyrolysis, Dangjin. | Two live investigations — a company fraud complaint against its former executives, and a police anti-graft raid (May 2026). |
Explore the field
TPI Review
Ranked company verdicts — what each player proves on the commercial record, and what it doesn't.
TPI Landscape
The competitive map: who owns the technology, who licenses, and who merely operates.
TPI Analyst
Our methodology, data sources and the reasoning behind every placement.